From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cudahy Packing Co. v. R. Rosenberg Sons Co.

Court of Appeal of California, First District
Apr 13, 1918
36 Cal.App. 818 (Cal. Ct. App. 1918)

Opinion

Civ. No. 2154.

April 13, 1918.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. James M. Seawell, Judge.

The questions involved are similar to those presented in Armour Co. v. R. Rosenberg Sons Co., ante, p. 773.

Ornbaun Fraser, for Appellant.

Louis H. Brownstone, for Respondent.


The questions involved in this appeal are in all respects similar to those presented in Armour Co. v. R. Rosenberg Sons Co. (No. 2104), ante, p. 773, [ 173 P. 404], and upon the authority of that case the judgment is reversed.

Zook, J., pro tem., and Beasly, J., pro tem., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the district court of appeal on May 13, 1918, and a petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on June 10, 1918.


Summaries of

Cudahy Packing Co. v. R. Rosenberg Sons Co.

Court of Appeal of California, First District
Apr 13, 1918
36 Cal.App. 818 (Cal. Ct. App. 1918)
Case details for

Cudahy Packing Co. v. R. Rosenberg Sons Co.

Case Details

Full title:CUDAHY PACKING COMPANY, Appellant, v. R. ROSENBERG SONS CO., Respondent

Court:Court of Appeal of California, First District

Date published: Apr 13, 1918

Citations

36 Cal.App. 818 (Cal. Ct. App. 1918)
173 P. 406

Citing Cases

State ex inf. Gentry v. Long-Bell Lumber Co.

6; Low v. Cent. Pac. Railroad Co., 52 Cal. 53; Fidelity Trust Co. v. Louisville Gas Co., 118 Ky. 588;…

Central Lumber Co. v. Schilleci

The lumber companies, being expressly authorized to carry on a general contracting business in the…