From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cruz v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 26, 1994
207 A.D.2d 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

September 26, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lerner, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs payable by the defendant-respondent Casa Grande Realty Corp. and the third-party defendant-respondent U.G.R. Construction Co., Inc., the appellant's motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as it is asserted against the appellant, the cross claims against the appellant are dismissed, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.

If there is any doubt as to the existence of a triable issue, summary judgment must be denied (see, Museums at Stony Brook v Village of Patchogue Fire Dept., 146 A.D.2d 572). Mere conclusions or unsupported assertions are insufficient to raise a question of fact (see, Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562; Jones v. Sumo Container Sta., 186 A.D.2d 539).

Here, there is only a conclusory and speculative allegation that Thomas Novelli Contracting Corp. (hereinafter Novelli) provided the plaintiff with a defective ladder. There is no evidence that Novelli owned or supplied the ladder from which the plaintiff fell. Accordingly, Novelli is entitled to summary judgment. Thompson, J.P., Sullivan, Altman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cruz v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 26, 1994
207 A.D.2d 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Cruz v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:JOSE A. CRUZ, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent, CASA GRANDE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 26, 1994

Citations

207 A.D.2d 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
616 N.Y.S.2d 986

Citing Cases

Smith v. Fashion Tower

ee Rizzuto v L.A. Wenger Contr. Co., 91 NY2d 343, 352). "Where the alleged defect or dangerous condition…

Giambalvo v. Chemical Bank

Under these circumstances. Chemical cannot be held liable for the plaintiff's accident pursuant to Labor Law…