From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crutchfield v. Wainwright

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Dec 19, 1985
779 F.2d 1466 (11th Cir. 1985)

Opinion

No. 84-3508.

December 19, 1985.

Thomas H. Bateman, III, Dept. of Legal Affairs, Tallahassee, Fla., for respondents-appellants.

Gwendolyn Spivey, Tallahassee, Fla., for petitioner-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida; William Stafford, Chief Judge.

Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RONEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HENDERSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON and CLARK, Circuit Judges.


ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN [2] BANC [3] (Opinion October 3, 1985, 11th Cir., 1985, 772 F.2d 839)


A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.


Summaries of

Crutchfield v. Wainwright

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Dec 19, 1985
779 F.2d 1466 (11th Cir. 1985)
Case details for

Crutchfield v. Wainwright

Case Details

Full title:BARNEY EARL CRUTCHFIELD, PETITIONER-APPELLEE, v. LOUIE L. WAINWRIGHT, JIM…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Dec 19, 1985

Citations

779 F.2d 1466 (11th Cir. 1985)

Citing Cases

State v. Mebane

The Appellate Court rejected a rule of per se reversal, stating instead that it would employ a harmless error…

State v. Mebane

Nonetheless, denial of access during any recess of the type likely to arise in the course of a day at trial…