From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crown Hotel v. Friedman

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Nov 2, 1982
420 So. 2d 418 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. AK-425.

October 14, 1982. Rehearing Denied November 2, 1982.

Appeal from the Deputy Commissioner.

Donald D. Gillis of Underwood, Gillis, Karcher, Reinert Valle, Miami, for appellants.

Ronnie Klein Witlin of Witlin Witlin, Miami, for appellees.


Employer/carrier appeal a workers' compensation order which patently does not dispose of all matured issues in controversy between the parties. The date of maximum medical improvement having been set, the issue of wage loss was ripe for adjudication. The deputy commissioner's decision to withhold determination of that issue renders the order interlocutory and non-appealable. Town of Palm Beach v. Watts, 7 FLW 1330, Case No. AG-291 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

The appeal is therefore dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to seek review of the order in the event of an appeal from a final order on the claim.

McCORD and BOOTH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Crown Hotel v. Friedman

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Nov 2, 1982
420 So. 2d 418 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

Crown Hotel v. Friedman

Case Details

Full title:THE CROWN HOTEL AND KENT INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANTS, v. PHILIP FRIEDMAN…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Nov 2, 1982

Citations

420 So. 2d 418 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

Yachts v. Warren

The order is thus interlocutory and not presently appealable. Crown Hotel v. Friedman, 420 So.2d 418 (Fla.…

Winkel v. Grand Union Stores

Thus, the order would appear facially to be non-final and non-appealable because it did not dispose of all…