From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crowell v. Baker Oil Tools

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 9, 1948
165 F.2d 214 (9th Cir. 1948)

Opinion

No. 11645.

January 9, 1948.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of California, Central Division; Campbell E. Beaumont, Judge.

Joseph F. Westall, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Mellin and Hanscom, of San Francisco, Cal. (Oscar A. Mellin, of San Francisco, Cal., of counsel), for appellee.

Before MATHEWS, STEPHENS, and ORR, Circuit Judges.


The order appealed from is affirmed upon the authority of Kessler v. Eldred, 206 U.S. 285, 27 S.Ct. 611, 51 L.Ed. 1065; Marshall v. Bryant Electric Co., 1 Cir., 185 F. 499; Directoplate Corporation v. Huebner-Bleistein Patents Co., 7 Cir., 44 F.2d 783; Aleograph Co. v. Electrical Research Products, 5 Cir., 82 F.2d 625; General Chemical Co. v. Standard Wholesale Phosphate Acid Works, 4 Cir., 101 F.2d 178; United States Galvanizing Plating Equipment Corporation v. Hanson-Van Winkle-Munning Co., 4 Cir., 104 F.2d 856; Fretwell v. Gillette Safety Razor Co., 4 Cir., 106 F.2d 728.


Summaries of

Crowell v. Baker Oil Tools

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 9, 1948
165 F.2d 214 (9th Cir. 1948)
Case details for

Crowell v. Baker Oil Tools

Case Details

Full title:Erd V. CROWELL, Appellant, v. BAKER OIL TOOLS, Inc., Appellee

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jan 9, 1948

Citations

165 F.2d 214 (9th Cir. 1948)

Citing Cases

Leishman v. Radio Condenser Co.

There is no merit in this contention. It is well settled that, where the owner of a patent and the…