From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crouse v. State

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III
Jan 18, 2012
2012 Ark. App. 58 (Ark. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. CACR 11–322.

01-18-2012

Kevin Kyle CROUSE, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee.

Charles Brian Williams, for appellant.


Charles Brian Williams, for appellant.

After a hearing, on November 2, 2010, the Crittenden County Circuit Court revoked Kevin Kyle Crouse's probation and sentenced him to 144 months in the Arkansas Department of Correction. Crouse had been placed on 60 months' probation on February 19, 2010, in exchange for his guilty plea to possession of narcotics with intent to deliver, a Class Y felony. He also received 60 months' suspended imposition of sentence when he pled guilty to possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to use, a Class B felony.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4–3(k), Crouse's counsel filed a motion to withdraw on the ground that the appeal is wholly without merit. The clerk of this court sent Crouse a certified copy of his counsel's brief and motion to be relieved and informed him that he had the right to file pro se points for reversal. Crouse did not avail himself of his right to file pro se points. Upon review of the record, however, we determined that this case must be reversed and remanded.

Probation is not an authorized disposition for a Class Y felony, so Crouse's underlying sentence of probation is illegal. Ark.Code Ann. § 5–4–104 (Supp.2011); see Wade v. State, 2011 Ark.App. 464. The issue of whether the appellant received an illegal sentence goes to subject-matter jurisdiction, and we may review the issue whether or not an objection was made in the circuit court. Ritchie v. State, 2009 Ark.App. 522, 337 S.W.3d 529. A sentence is void or illegal when the court lacks authority to impose it. Id. Accordingly, we reverse and remand this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Motion to be relieved denied; reversed and remanded.

ROBBINS and ABRAMSON, JJ., agree.


Summaries of

Crouse v. State

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III
Jan 18, 2012
2012 Ark. App. 58 (Ark. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Crouse v. State

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN KYLE CROUSE APPELLANT v. STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE

Court:ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III

Date published: Jan 18, 2012

Citations

2012 Ark. App. 58 (Ark. Ct. App. 2012)

Citing Cases

Williams v. State

2006) (emphasis added). Williams's underlying sentence of probation was illegal, making his probationary…

Crouse v. State

Crouse originally appealed the order to the court of appeals, which reversed and remanded the matter, holding…