From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Croton Falls Fire District v. Pierce Mfg. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 4, 1987
130 A.D.2d 456 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

May 4, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Walsh, J.).


Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof which denied that branch of the defendant's motion which was to strike the demand for punitive damages, and substituting therefor a provision granting that branch of the motion. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The complaint alleged, in essence, that a fire truck that the plaintiff had purchased from the defendant was involved in an accident, and was found thereafter to be totally unsafe for operation due to negligence in the manufacturing process and a design defect. These allegations are adequate to state causes of action sounding in negligence and strict products liability (see, Hartford Ins. Group v. Curry Chevrolet Sales Serv., 119 A.D.2d 546).

However, giving the complaint every favorable inference that could be drawn therefrom (Siegel, N Y Prac § 265), it fails to allege any ground upon which to premise an award of punitive damages (see, Walker v. Sheldon, 10 N.Y.2d 401). Weinstein, J.P., Spatt, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Croton Falls Fire District v. Pierce Mfg. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 4, 1987
130 A.D.2d 456 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Croton Falls Fire District v. Pierce Mfg. Co.

Case Details

Full title:CROTON FALLS FIRE DISTRICT, Respondent, v. PIERCE MANUFACTURING COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 4, 1987

Citations

130 A.D.2d 456 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Adamo v. Brown Williamson

( FDA v Brown Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 US 120; Geier v American Honda Motor Co., 529 US 861; Medtronic,…