From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crossno v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Oct 22, 2014
CASE NO. 5:14CV00259 BSM (E.D. Ark. Oct. 22, 2014)

Opinion

CASE NO. 5:14CV00259 BSM

10-22-2014

MICHAEL JAMES CROSSNO PETITIONER v. RAY HOBBS, Director of the Arkansas Department of Correction RESPONDENT


JUDGMENT

Consistent with the order entered this day, the petition is dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 22nd day of October 2014.

/s/_________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Crossno v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Oct 22, 2014
CASE NO. 5:14CV00259 BSM (E.D. Ark. Oct. 22, 2014)
Case details for

Crossno v. Hobbs

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL JAMES CROSSNO PETITIONER v. RAY HOBBS, Director of the Arkansas…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: Oct 22, 2014

Citations

CASE NO. 5:14CV00259 BSM (E.D. Ark. Oct. 22, 2014)

Citing Cases

Roberts v. Musclewhite

Federal courts have repeatedly held that the Arkansas statutes create only a possibility of parole, and thus…

Proctor v. Arkansas Department of Correction

Federal courts have repeatedly held that the Arkansas statutes create only a possibility of parole, and thus…