From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crossno v. Cowell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS BATESVILLE DIVISION
Dec 5, 2012
NO: 1:11CV00120 HDY (E.D. Ark. Dec. 5, 2012)

Opinion

NO: 1:11CV00120 HDY

12-05-2012

JAMES CROSSNO ADC #089129 PLAINTIFF v. BILLY COWELL et al. DEFENDANTS


JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the order filed this date, judgment is entered dismissing this case without prejudice with respect to Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Ray Hobbs, Wendy Kelley, Joe Page, and Jennifer Horn, and with prejudice in all other respects; the relief sought is denied. The Court further certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.

_______________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Crossno v. Cowell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS BATESVILLE DIVISION
Dec 5, 2012
NO: 1:11CV00120 HDY (E.D. Ark. Dec. 5, 2012)
Case details for

Crossno v. Cowell

Case Details

Full title:JAMES CROSSNO ADC #089129 PLAINTIFF v. BILLY COWELL et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS BATESVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Dec 5, 2012

Citations

NO: 1:11CV00120 HDY (E.D. Ark. Dec. 5, 2012)