From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crossland Sav. v. Sackman Enterprises, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 5, 1992
181 A.D.2d 432 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Summary

holding that robber displays a weapon by putting his hand inside his jacket and asking victim if it would "make a difference" if he had a gun

Summary of this case from Moses v. Commonwealth

Opinion

March 5, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Diane A. Lebedeff, J.).


RPAPL 1301 (3) does not bar plaintiff from maintaining this action to enforce defendants' guarantees, since the debt sought to be enforced in the separate mortgage foreclosure action is separate and distinct from that guaranteed by defendants herein. Accordingly, as the IAS held, defendants have failed to set forth a meritorious defense sufficient to vacate the default.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Rosenberger, Ellerin and Kassal, JJ.


Summaries of

Crossland Sav. v. Sackman Enterprises, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 5, 1992
181 A.D.2d 432 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

holding that robber displays a weapon by putting his hand inside his jacket and asking victim if it would "make a difference" if he had a gun

Summary of this case from Moses v. Commonwealth
Case details for

Crossland Sav. v. Sackman Enterprises, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CROSSLAND SAVINGS, FSB, Respondent, v. SACKMAN ENTERPRISES, INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 5, 1992

Citations

181 A.D.2d 432 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
580 N.Y.S.2d 758

Citing Cases

Wachovia Bank v. 75 Schermerhorn LLC

Given the particular terms of the Guaranty at issue, because the liability of Klein and PLC would be separate…

Nexbank v. Soffer

That is why, as is the case here, "a separate action may be brought against the guarantors for any money…