From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cross v. Maass

Oregon Court of Appeals
Apr 20, 1994
127 Or. App. 554 (Or. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

89C-12095; CA A79509

Submitted on record and briefs March 23, 1994.

Reversed and remanded with instructions to grant delayed appeal April 20, 1994.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marion County, Duane R. Ertsgaard, Judge.

David W. Knofler and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant.

Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Rolf C. Moan, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Richardson, Chief Judge, and Deits and Riggs, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded with instructions to grant delayed appeal.


Petitioner appeals a judgment dismissing his petition for post-conviction relief. ORS 138.650. He seeks a delayed appeal, because the counsel appointed to file a notice of appeal from his convictions failed to do so and he was denied constitutionally adequate assistance of counsel. The state concedes that petitioner is entitled to a delayed appeal. Clawson v. Maass, 119 Or. App. 287, 850 P.2d 398 (1993). We accept that concession.

Reversed and remanded with instructions to grant delayed appeal.


Summaries of

Cross v. Maass

Oregon Court of Appeals
Apr 20, 1994
127 Or. App. 554 (Or. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Cross v. Maass

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER ALAN CROSS, Appellant, v. Manfred (Fred) MAASS…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Apr 20, 1994

Citations

127 Or. App. 554 (Or. Ct. App. 1994)
873 P.2d 436

Citing Cases

Granlund v. Lampert

The state concedes that petitioner's counsel provided constitutionally inadequate representation by failing…