From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cross v. Dretke

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Corpus Christi Division
Dec 28, 2005
Civil Action No. C-04-108 (S.D. Tex. Dec. 28, 2005)

Opinion

Civil Action No. C-04-108.

December 28, 2005


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL


On July 12, 2005, the United States Magistrate Judge filed her Memorandum and Recommendation in this cause (D.E. 55). Plaintiff's objections (D.E. 58) were considered timely filed by order of the Magistrate Judge (D.E. 59). Plaintiff does not raise any specific objections to the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation, but instead offers a recitation of plaintiff's claims of deliberate indifference, conspiracy and retaliation. Furthermore, the cases plaintiff cites regarding qualified immunity are not relevant. Therefore, the Court finds that plaintiff's objections are without merit.

Having reviewed de novo the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation and the pleadings on file, this Court hereby adopts as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge.

Accordingly, defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (D.E. 52) is granted and all of plaintiff's claims against all defendants are dismissed with prejudice.

ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cross v. Dretke

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Corpus Christi Division
Dec 28, 2005
Civil Action No. C-04-108 (S.D. Tex. Dec. 28, 2005)
Case details for

Cross v. Dretke

Case Details

Full title:DAVID ALLEN CROSS, v. DOUG DRETKE, et al

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Corpus Christi Division

Date published: Dec 28, 2005

Citations

Civil Action No. C-04-108 (S.D. Tex. Dec. 28, 2005)

Citing Cases

Parks v. Williamson

Nor would any delay resulting therefrom for his consideration for parole implicate Due Process concerns.…