Cross v. Cross

Full title: ANNA CROSS, Respondent, v. MARGARET CROSS and Others, Appellants

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1927

222 App. Div. 791 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

Opinion

December, 1927

Present — Hubbs, P.J., Clark, Sears, Crouch and Taylor, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the question of the competency of the witness Mary Rudes under section 347 of the Civil Practice Act was not sufficiently raised, and the evidence supports the findings. All concur.