From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crociere v. Escobar

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 27, 2005
934 So. 2d 510 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Summary

declining to address the merits because the motion was untimely filed

Summary of this case from Caraffa v. Carnival Corp.

Opinion

No. 3D04-1016.

July 27, 2005.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Stuart M. Simons, Judge.

McAlpin Brais, P.A., Miami, and Richard J. McAlpin, and Barbara J. Conner, Fort Myers; Robert S. Glazier, Miami, for appellants.

Rebecca B. Watford, Miami, for appellee.

Before GREEN, SHEPHERD, and CORTIÑAS, JJ.


Affirmed. See Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.061(g); Wedge Hotel Mgmt., (Bahamas), Ltd. v. Meier, 868 So.2d 552, 552 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) ("Wedge's motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens was not filed until May 6, 2002, well past the sixty day time limit of 1.061(g). As Wedge's motion was untimely under the plain language of 1.061(g), we need not address the merits of the arguments raised in the motion.").


Summaries of

Crociere v. Escobar

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 27, 2005
934 So. 2d 510 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

declining to address the merits because the motion was untimely filed

Summary of this case from Caraffa v. Carnival Corp.
Case details for

Crociere v. Escobar

Case Details

Full title:COSTA CROCIERE, S.P.A., Prestige Cruises N.V., Cruise Ships Catering and…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jul 27, 2005

Citations

934 So. 2d 510 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Citing Cases

Caraffa v. Carnival Corp.

Id. at 552. See also Costa Crociere, S.P.A. v. Escobar, 934 So.2d 510, 511 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (declining to…