From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crescent v. Reddy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1920
191 App. Div. 909 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)

Opinion

March, 1920.


If such an appeal lies, it must be from an interlocutory judgment, not an order. But there is no appeal from an interlocutory judgment of the County Court, but only from such a judgment of the Supreme Court. (See Henn v. City of Mount Vernon, 190 App. Div. 533, and cases cited.) Therefore, without now passing upon the merits of the demurrer, we dismiss this appeal, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Rich, Blackmar, Kelly and Jaycox, JJ., concur. Appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.


Summaries of

Crescent v. Reddy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1920
191 App. Div. 909 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)
Case details for

Crescent v. Reddy

Case Details

Full title:REGINA CRESCENT, Appellant, v . BRIDGET REDDY (née WHALEN) and Others…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1920

Citations

191 App. Div. 909 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)