From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Credit Alliance Corporation v. Arthur Andersen Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 12, 1985
66 N.Y.2d 812 (N.Y. 1985)

Opinion

Submitted August 12, 1985

Decided November 12, 1985


Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: "The dismissal of the cause of action based upon fraud is without prejudice to an application by plaintiffs to Supreme Court for leave to serve an amended complaint with regard to that cause of action. Such application should include a copy of the proposed amended complaint accompanied by a disclosure of the evidentiary facts which would support the claims set forth in the proposed amended complaint and would justify the granting of such leave (see, CPLR 3016 [b]; cf. CPLR 3211 [d], [e])."

Judge ALEXANDER taking no part.


Summaries of

Credit Alliance Corporation v. Arthur Andersen Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 12, 1985
66 N.Y.2d 812 (N.Y. 1985)
Case details for

Credit Alliance Corporation v. Arthur Andersen Co.

Case Details

Full title:CREDIT ALLIANCE CORPORATION et al., Respondents, v. ARTHUR ANDERSEN CO.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 12, 1985

Citations

66 N.Y.2d 812 (N.Y. 1985)
498 N.Y.S.2d 362
489 N.E.2d 249

Citing Cases

Boykin v. Arthur Andersen Co.

1, Ala.R.Civ.P. With regard to Boykin and Apon's claims against defendant Arthur Andersen, the trial court…

Bily v. Aurther Young & co.

The trial court instructed the jury that " [a]n accountant owes a further duty of care to those third parties…