From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crayton v. Sailormen, Inc.

United States District Court, Southern District of Georgia
Oct 16, 2023
2:22-cv-00004-LGW-BWC (S.D. Ga. Oct. 16, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00004-LGW-BWC

10-16-2023

TALETHA CRAYTON, Individually and behalf of others similarly situated Plaintiff, v. SAILORMEN, INC., Defendant. CIVIL ACTION FILE


ORDER

THE HONORABLE LISA G. WOOD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

This matter is before the Court on the parties' Joint Motion For Court Approval Of FLSA Settlement And Release Agreement. For the reasons herein, the Joint Motion is GRANTED.

In her Amended Complaint, Plaintiff asserts a claim against Defendant for unpaid overtime wages pursuant to the Fair Labor Standard Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq., (“FLSA”). The parties have informed the Court that, after the voluntary production of documents related to this claim and negotiations through their attorneys, they have reached a settlement of this claim. Pursuant to Lynn's Food Stores v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350,1352-53 (11th Cir. 1982), however, the Court is required to review the parties' settlement agreement.

In conducting this review, a district court must “scrutiniz[e] the settlement for fairness,” and determine whether the settlement is a “fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute over FLSA provisions.” Id. at 352-53. A settlement entered into in an adversarial context where both sides are represented by counsel throughout the litigation “is more likely to reflect a reasonable compromise of disputed issues.” Id. The district court may approve the settlement in order to promote the policy of encouraging settlement of litigation. Id. at 1354.

Here, the parties acknowledge there is a bona fide dispute regarding Plaintiffs claims.

However, the parties represent that they have been able to reach a settlement agreement with respect to these claims, and the Plaintiff acknowledges that the amounts that are to be paid to her under the settlement agreement fairly compensate her for alleged overtime wages and liquidated damages claimed to be owed to her by the Defendant, as well as for her attorney's fees incurred in connection with her claims. In exchange for these payments, Plaintiff has agreed to a release of FLSA and wage & hour claims against the Defendant and to dismiss her Amended Complaint and this civil action in its entirety with prejudice.

The Court has reviewed the settlement agreement executed by the parties as filed with the Court in the public record and, based on the contents therein and the representations of the parties, finds that the compromise reached is a fair and reasonable resolution of the dispute. Therefore, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the parties' Joint Motion to Approve Settlement Agreement and Dismiss Claims is GRANTED, that the Court APPROVES the settlement agreement between the parties, and ORDERS that Plaintiff's Amended Complaint and this civil action in its entirety is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Crayton v. Sailormen, Inc.

United States District Court, Southern District of Georgia
Oct 16, 2023
2:22-cv-00004-LGW-BWC (S.D. Ga. Oct. 16, 2023)
Case details for

Crayton v. Sailormen, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TALETHA CRAYTON, Individually and behalf of others similarly situated…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Georgia

Date published: Oct 16, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-00004-LGW-BWC (S.D. Ga. Oct. 16, 2023)