From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crawmer v. United States

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Mar 31, 2022
3:22-cv-50 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 31, 2022)

Opinion

3:22-cv-50

03-31-2022

STEFAN CHADWICK CRAWMER, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Walter H. Rice United States District Judge

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (ECF No. 5) to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Petition be DISMISSED without prejudice. Petitioner is DENIED any requested certificate of appealability and the Court hereby certifies to the United States Court of Appeals that an appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis.

Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 58, the Clerk shall enter judgment to this effect. 1


Summaries of

Crawmer v. United States

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Mar 31, 2022
3:22-cv-50 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 31, 2022)
Case details for

Crawmer v. United States

Case Details

Full title:STEFAN CHADWICK CRAWMER, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio

Date published: Mar 31, 2022

Citations

3:22-cv-50 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 31, 2022)

Citing Cases

Perry v. Phipps

In Ohio, defendants have “a remedy by way of a motion to dismiss the indictment in [their] criminal case if…

Calhoun v. Lynch

In Ohio, defendants have “a remedy by way of a motion to dismiss the indictment in [their] criminal case if…