rejecting claim that, despite lack of objection from defense counsel at trial, the trial judge should have excluded evidence of prior bad acts, because defense counsel had made a tactical decision to use the evidence in a way that he thought would be to his client's advantage
Summary of this case from Prince v. StateNo. 634, 2006.
May 23, 2007.
Appeal from the Superior Cr 0512021018.
Decisions Without Published Opinions Affirmed.
rejecting claim that, despite lack of objection from defense counsel at trial, the trial judge should have excluded evidence of prior bad acts, because defense counsel had made a tactical decision to use the evidence in a way that he thought would be to his client's advantage
Summary of this case from Prince v. StateFull title:Crawley v. State
Court:Supreme Court of Delaware
Date published: May 23, 2007
Id. (citing Czech v. State, 945 A.2d 1088, 1097 (Del.2008)).Id.; e.g., Czech, 945 A.2d at 1098; Crawley v.…
Rybicki v. StateWinn v. State, 1993 WL 144875, at *2 (Del.1993).Wright v. State, 980 A.2d 1020, 1023 (Del. 2009) (internal…