From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crawley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 8, 1989
539 So. 2d 1162 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 87-767.

March 8, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Polk County, Edward F. Threadgill, Jr., J.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and T. Orin Lee, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William I. Munsey, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


The appellant's contention that he was misadvised as to the consequences of his nolo contendere plea is not properly presented in a direct appeal; it should be raised in the trial court on a motion to withdraw the plea or a motion to vacate pursuant to rule 3.850 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

The appeal is dismissed.

FRANK, A.C.J., and PARKER and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Crawley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 8, 1989
539 So. 2d 1162 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Crawley v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVID EDWARD CRAWLEY, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Mar 8, 1989

Citations

539 So. 2d 1162 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Strong v. State

Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla. 1979). As a prerequisite to raising such an issue on appeal, however,…

McCarty v. State

Affirmed without prejudice to file a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Isley v.…