From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crane v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jul 3, 1957
98 S.E.2d 903 (Ga. 1957)

Opinion

19727.

SUBMITTED JUNE 10, 1957.

DECIDED JULY 3, 1957.

Murder; appellate procedure. Before Judge Davis. Dade Superior Court. March 8, 1957.

Graham Glover, Bert Garstin, for plaintiff in error.

Earl B. Self, Solicitor-General, C. T. Culbert, Assistant Solicitor-General, Eugene Cook, Attorney-General, Rubye G. Jackson, contra.


The defendant was convicted of murder, with a recommendation to mercy. His motion for a new trial was denied. He filed his bill of exceptions to this Court. Before a decision had been rendered, proper notice and affidavits were filed in this court, averring that the defendant had escaped from jail and was a fugitive from justice. This court issued an order directing the defendant to furnish evidence of his surrender or recapture by June 20, 1957. No such evidence has been furnished this court. Held:

Notice of the escape from custody of the defendant, who was convicted of murder, having been brought to this court by affidavit of the proper officer, and the defendant having made no response to the order of this court to furnish evidence of his surrender or recapture, so as to insure submission to the judgment of this court when rendered, the writ of error is dismissed. Gentry v. State, 91 Ga. 669 ( 17 S.E. 956).

Writ of error dismissed. All the Justices concur. Duckworth, C. J., concurs specially.

SUBMITTED JUNE 10, 1957 — DECIDED JULY 3, 1957.


I concur specially solely because I am bound by the decision cited and other decisions to the same effect, all of which I consider unsound and favor overruling.


Summaries of

Crane v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jul 3, 1957
98 S.E.2d 903 (Ga. 1957)
Case details for

Crane v. State

Case Details

Full title:CRANE v. THE STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Jul 3, 1957

Citations

98 S.E.2d 903 (Ga. 1957)
98 S.E.2d 903

Citing Cases

Crane v. State

The direct appeal of the appellant, Paul Crane, from his 1956 conviction of murder and life sentence, was…

Clark v. State

Thus, even assuming arguendo that the state's motion would otherwise have merit in a case such as this one,…