From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Craig v. Mills Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Oct 30, 2009
350 F. App'x 714 (3d Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 08-2636.

Submitted pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) September 29, 2009.

Opinion filed: October 30, 2009.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Civ. No. 2-06-cv-05503), Judge: Honorable Eduardo C. Robreno.

Steven E. Wolfe, Esq., Holland, PA, for Appellants.

Jay E. Kagan, Esq., Dilworth Paxson, John G. Devlin, Esq., John G. Devlin Associates, Philadelphia, PA, for The Mills Corporation, dba Franklin Mills; Franklin Mills Associates, L.P.; Control Building Services, Inc.

Before: McKEE, CHAGARES and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges.


OPINION


Christine and James Craig appeal the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants on the tort claim they filed to recover for injuries Christine suffered after slipping and falling at the defendants' retail shopping mall. We will affirm.

As we write primarily for the parties who are familiar with this case, we need not recite the procedural or factual background. Moreover, we have reviewed the thoughtful Memorandum filed by the Hon. Eduardo Robreno on May 23, 2008, 555 F.Supp.2d 547, explaining why there is no genuine issue of material fact as to defendants' liability and why the defendants are therefore entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

We can add little to Judge Robreno's discussion of this case and we will therefore affirm the order he entered on May 23, 2008, granting summary judgment in favor of Control Building Services, and Franklin Mills Associates, L.P., and against Christine and James Craig, substantially for the reasons set forth therein.


Summaries of

Craig v. Mills Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Oct 30, 2009
350 F. App'x 714 (3d Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Craig v. Mills Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Christine CRAIG; James Craig W/H, Appellants v. The MILLS CORPORATION, dba…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Oct 30, 2009

Citations

350 F. App'x 714 (3d Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

Stover v. Chester Downs & Marina, LLC

Moreover, normally the constructive notice question is within the ken of the jury to decide. Craig v.…

Modica v. Maple Meadows Homeowners Ass'n

See, e.g., Craig v. Franklin Mills Assocs., L.P., 555 F. Supp. 2d 547, 550 (E.D. Pa. 2008) ("The duration of…