From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crabtree v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Feb 17, 2012
Case No. 3:10cv00458 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 17, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 3:10cv00458

02-17-2012

JON E. CRABTREE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant.


District Judge Walter Herbert Rice

Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington


DECISION AND ENTRY

The Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #14), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendations filed on January 30, 2012 (Doc. #14) is ADOPTED in full;
2. The Commissioner's non-disability finding is vacated;
3. No finding is made as to whether Plaintiff Jon E. Crabtree was under a "disability" within the meaning of the Social Security Act;
4. This case is remanded to the Commissioner and the Administrative Law Judge under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g) for further consideration consistent with this Decision and Entry and the Report and Recommendations; and
5. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court.

__________________

Walter Herbert Rice

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Crabtree v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Feb 17, 2012
Case No. 3:10cv00458 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 17, 2012)
Case details for

Crabtree v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:JON E. CRABTREE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Feb 17, 2012

Citations

Case No. 3:10cv00458 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 17, 2012)

Citing Cases

Ravnell v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

The ALJ must consider both physical and mental impairments when analyzing whether a claimant meets this…

Howard v. Colvin

' " . . . Thus, the ALJ in Daniels found the plaintiff was not mentally retarded because she failed to meet…