From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cozart v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 2, 2002
823 So. 2d 234 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

Case No. 1D02-0607

Opinion filed August 2, 2002.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County. Paul A. Rasmussen, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James W. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


This direct criminal appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Having reviewed the entire record, we agree that no reversible error occurred. We affirm the appellant's revocation of probation and imposition of judgment and sentence. However, we note that the record does not contain a written order of revocation of probation. We thus remand for the trial court to enter such an order, consistent with its oral pronouncement. See Walker v. State, 686 So.2d 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). The appellant need not be present.

AFFIRMED.

MINER, KAHN, and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cozart v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 2, 2002
823 So. 2d 234 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Cozart v. State

Case Details

Full title:ADAM JOSEPH COZART, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Aug 2, 2002

Citations

823 So. 2d 234 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Twitty v. State

However, because the trial court failed to enter amended orders of revocation reflecting Twitty's plea of not…

Travis v. State

The case is therefore remanded to the trial court for entry of an amended order. Appellant need not be…