From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coyne v. Silvers

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
May 28, 1946
187 Misc. 357 (N.Y. App. Term 1946)

Opinion

May 28, 1946.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, LEWIS, J.

Arthur Richenthal and Irving M. Moss for appellant.

Leon Finley and David S. Meyer for tenants, respondents.



MEMORANDUM


The fact that the landlord desires to engage in a business similar to that conducted by the tenant does not deprive him of his right to secure possession of the premises where, as in the instant case, he establishes his good faith in seeking such possession for his immediate and personal use.

The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and final order directed for landlord as prayed for in petition, with costs

EDER and HECHT, JJ., concur in memorandum Per Curiam;


I dissent and vote for affirmance. Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Coyne v. Silvers

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
May 28, 1946
187 Misc. 357 (N.Y. App. Term 1946)
Case details for

Coyne v. Silvers

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL COYNE, Landlord, Appellant, v. MARTIN SILVERS et al., Tenants…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: May 28, 1946

Citations

187 Misc. 357 (N.Y. App. Term 1946)
63 N.Y.S.2d 444

Citing Cases

Kristel v. Steinberg

This being the present state of the law on that question, this argument, no matter how much it appeals to…

Coyne v. Silvers

October 11, 1946. Present — Martin, P.J., Townley, Glennon, Dore and Cohn, JJ. [ 187 Misc. 357.]…