From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

COX v. CONNER

United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, at Paducah
Sep 25, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:09CV-P137-R (W.D. Ky. Sep. 25, 2009)

Summary

In Conner v. Cox, 22 S.W. 605, 15 Ky. Law Rep. 140, Conner owned a 1/27th interest in 165 acres, a part of which adjoined his other land including a narrow strip between his home and the highway.

Summary of this case from Whitefort v. Barron

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:09CV-P137-R.

September 25, 2009


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


By Order entered August 7, 2009, this Court denied Plaintiff's application to proceed without prepayment of fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and directed him to pay the requisite $350.00 filing fee for the instant action within 30 days from entry of the Order (DN 5). The Court advised Plaintiff that failure to pay the filing fee within the time allowed would result in dismissal of the action.

Review of the record in this action reveals that Plaintiff has failed to pay the requisite $350.00 filing fee. The Court will, therefore, dismiss the action by separate order pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) for failure to comply with a prior order of the Court and for failure to prosecute.

Dismissal of this action, however, does not relieve Plaintiff of his responsibility to pay the requisite filing fee in this action. In re Alea, 286 F.3d 378, 381 (6th Cir. 2002); McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 607 (6th Cir. 1997). The obligation to pay the filing fee attaches when a prisoner "brings a civil action." In re Alea, 286 F.3d at 381. "The subsequent dismissal of the action under § 1915(g) for failure to pay that fee does not negate or nullify the litigant's continuing obligation to pay the fee in full." Id.

Accordingly, the prior Order (DN 5) obligating Plaintiff to pay the $350.00 filing fee in this action remains in full effect. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Kentucky State Penitentiary shall forward the $350.00 from Plaintiff's inmate account to the Clerk for full payment of the filing fee. The payment shall be sent to the following address:

Office of the Clerk
United States District Court
Western District of Kentucky
106 Gene Snyder U. S. Courthouse
601 West Broadway
Louisville, Kentucky 40202-2249


Summaries of

COX v. CONNER

United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, at Paducah
Sep 25, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:09CV-P137-R (W.D. Ky. Sep. 25, 2009)

In Conner v. Cox, 22 S.W. 605, 15 Ky. Law Rep. 140, Conner owned a 1/27th interest in 165 acres, a part of which adjoined his other land including a narrow strip between his home and the highway.

Summary of this case from Whitefort v. Barron
Case details for

COX v. CONNER

Case Details

Full title:CLAUDE R. COX PLAINTIFF v. CHARLES CONNER DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, at Paducah

Date published: Sep 25, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:09CV-P137-R (W.D. Ky. Sep. 25, 2009)

Citing Cases

Owings v. Talbott

In the case of Shaw's Guardian v. Grimes, 187 Ky. 250, 218 S.W. 447, there were 1,274 acres involved, and…

Whitefort v. Barron

In all the cases we have had it was the owner of a smaller interest who asked to have his part laid off. In…