From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cox v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 25, 2001
287 A.D.2d 391 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

October 25, 2001.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered January 10, 2001, which granted plaintiff's motion to strike defendants' answer only to the extent of striking the answer of defendant New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation unless it appeared for deposition on a specified date by a person with knowledge of its treatment of plaintiff, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Soledad Rubert, for plaintiff-appellant.

Margaret G. King, for defendants-respondents.

Before: Rosenberger, J.P., Williams, Mazzarelli, Rubin, Buckley, JJ.


The drastic remedy of unconditionally striking either or both of defendants' answers was properly denied for lack of a clear showing that the failure to find a knowledgeable witness for deposition was willful or contumacious (see, Frye v. City of New York, 228 A.D.2d 182). While the record is replete with delay, some were the fault of plaintiff while others were related to difficulties finding requested documents.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Cox v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 25, 2001
287 A.D.2d 391 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Cox v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:DWAYNE COX, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 25, 2001

Citations

287 A.D.2d 391 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
731 N.Y.S.2d 618

Citing Cases

Acevedo v. Chan

Before: Sullivan, P.J., Williams, Ellerin, Lerner, Saxe, JJ. Defendants' failure to appear at their…