From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Covillo v. Specialty's Cafe & Bakery, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 6, 2013
Case No. 11-cv-00594 DMR (N.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 11-cv-00594 DMR

03-06-2013

NICOLA COVILLO and TROYREAC HENRY, JOHN CHISHOLM individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. SPECIALTY'S CAFÉ AND BAKERY, INC., and CRAIG SAXTON, Defendants.

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Francis J. Ortman III (State Bar No. 213202) Justin T. Curley (State Bar No. 233287) Emily E. Barker (State Bar No. 275166) Attorneys for Defendants SPECIALTY'S CAFE & BAKERY, INC. and CRAIG SAXTON


SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Francis J. Ortman III (State Bar No. 213202)
Justin T. Curley (State Bar No. 233287)
Emily E. Barker (State Bar No. 275166)
Attorneys for Defendants
SPECIALTY'S CAFE & BAKERY, INC.
and CRAIG SAXTON

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE HEARING AND BRIEFING

SCHEDULE RE DEFENDANT CRAIG SAXTON'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT


Complaint Filed: February 9, 2011

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-7, Defendant CRAIG SAXTON ("Saxton") and Plaintiffs NICOLA COVILLO, TROYREAC HENRY, and JOHN CHISHOLM ("Plaintiffs") hereby stipulate as follows:

1. The hearing on Saxton's Motion for Summary Judgment, Dkt. No. 137, shall be continued to May 9, 2013;

2. The current due date for Plaintiffs' Opposition to Saxton's Motion for Summary Judgment—March 7, 2013—is vacated.

3. The parties shall meet and confer regarding the opposition and reply briefing schedule for Saxton's Motion for Summary Judgment, and potentially continuing the May 9, 2013 hearing date, following the Court's March 14, 2013 hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion to Enforce Discovery Order and for Issue Preclusion Sanctions.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

______________________

HARRIS & RUBLE

Alan Harris

Priya Mohan

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

NICOLA COVILLO, TROYREAC HENRY, and

JOHN CHISHOLM, individually and on behalf of

all others similarly situated

______________________

NORTH BAY LAW GROUP

David S. Harris

Attorneys for Plaintiffs individually and on behalf of

all others similarly situated

______________________

Law Offices of James D. Rush, APC

James D. Rush

Attorneys for Plaintiffs individually and on behalf of

all others similarly situated

______________________

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

Francis J. Ortman III

Justin T. Curley

Emily E. Barker

Attorneys for Defendants

SPECIALTY'S CAFE & BAKERY, INC.

and CRAIG SAXTON

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

HONORABLE DONNA M. RYU

United States Magistrate Judge

EXHIBIT A: DECLARATION OF JUSTIN T. CURLEY

I, Justin T. Curley, declare:

1. I am an attorney admitted to practice law in the state of California, and am an associate with the law firm of Seyfarth Shaw LLP, attorneys of record for Defendants Specialty's Cafe and Bakery, Inc. and Craig Saxton. I make this declaration based on my personal knowledge, except as to those matters which are stated on information and belief, and as to those matters I believe them to be true. If called to do so, I could and would testify competently thereto.

2. I make this declaration in support of the parties' Stipulation and Proposed Order Re Hearing and Briefing Schedule Re Defendant Craig Saxton's Motion for Summary Judgment.

3. The reason for the requested time modification is to enable the parties to obtain further direction from the Court regarding production of e-mails and to allow Plaintiffs adequate time to review the e-mails for their opposition.

4. There have been several prior stipulations and orders in this action extending time, for example, to complete ADR and to submit Joint Discovery Letters. Most of the stipulations have been to extend time to submit Joint Discovery Letters to the Court, so as to provide the parties additional time to meet and confer and potentially resolve discovery disputes. See Dkt. Nos. 7, 22, 34, 38, 44, 49, 51, 54, 57, 71, 84, 92, 96, 101, 110.

5. The requested time modification regarding Mr. Saxton's Motion for Summary Judgment should have no effect on the schedule for this case. It will not affect any other court-ordered deadlines.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct, and that this declaration was executed on March 5, 2013 in San Francisco, California.

______________________

Justin T. Curley


Summaries of

Covillo v. Specialty's Cafe & Bakery, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 6, 2013
Case No. 11-cv-00594 DMR (N.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2013)
Case details for

Covillo v. Specialty's Cafe & Bakery, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:NICOLA COVILLO and TROYREAC HENRY, JOHN CHISHOLM individually and on…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 6, 2013

Citations

Case No. 11-cv-00594 DMR (N.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2013)