From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Courtney v. Duo Colony Fuel Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 19, 2002
300 A.D.2d 169 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2617N

December 19, 2002.

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton Tingling, J.), entered July 18, 2002, to the extent that said order directed defendants to supply the statement of a nonparty witness, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

Michael C. Wimpfheimer, for plaintiff-respondent.

Willard G. Lafauci, for defendants-appellants.

Before: NARDELLI, J.P., TOM, ELLERIN, FRIEDMAN, MARLOW, JJ.


The subject order is not appealable as of right because it does not decide a motion made upon notice (see CPLR 5701[a][2];Daniels v. City of New York, 291 A.D.2d 260), and we dismiss the appeal.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Courtney v. Duo Colony Fuel Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 19, 2002
300 A.D.2d 169 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Courtney v. Duo Colony Fuel Corp.

Case Details

Full title:RENEE S. COURTNEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DUO COLONY FUEL CORP., ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 19, 2002

Citations

300 A.D.2d 169 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
751 N.Y.S.2d 732

Citing Cases

Davis v. North Presbyterian Church

The appeal is taken from an order that did not decide a motion which either party had made upon notice.…

Ayala v. Delgado

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Andrias, Saxe, Williams, JJ. The subject judgment, which was entered pursuant…