From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

County of Westchester v. Dept. Health, C. N.Y

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 29, 1947
74 N.E.2d 190 (N.Y. 1947)

Summary

In County of Westchester v. Department of Health of City of New York (297 N.Y. 491, supra) the denial of the motion to change the place of venue from Westchester County to New York County, was by reason of section 118 of the Westchester County Charter [L. 1937, ch. 617] which expressly provided that Westchester County shall be the place of venue of any action in which Westchester County was a party.

Summary of this case from Reeve v. O'DWYER

Opinion

Argued May 13, 1947

Decided May 29, 1947

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, SNEED, J.

Charles E. Murphy, Corporation Counsel ( W. Bernard Richland, Bernard Friedlander and Joseph J. Lucchi of counsel), for appellants.

Harry G. Herman, County Attorney ( Francis J. Morgan of counsel), for respondents.

Marcus G. Christ, County Attorney ( John J. Knob of counsel), for County of Nassau, amicus curiae, in support of respondents' position.

Henry Epstein and James M. Grossman for Sheffield Farms Company, Queensboro Farms Products, Inc., Middletown Milk Cream Co., Inc., and Crowley's Milk Company, Inc., defendants.

Seward A. Miller for Dairymen's League Co-operative Association, Inc., defendant.

A. Donald MacKinnon for The Borden Company, defendant.


In the courts below the motion for change of venue was properly denied and the motion for an injunction pendente lite was granted in the exercise of discretion. There was no abuse of discretion and, accordingly, the orders appealed from are affirmed, and all questions affecting the validity of regulation 2a of the Board of Health of the City of New York are reserved for consideration and determination upon a trial of the issues. The orders are affirmed, with costs and the question certified is answered in the affirmative.

LOUGHRAN, Ch J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, THACHER, DYE and FULD, JJ., concur.

Orders affirmed, etc.


Summaries of

County of Westchester v. Dept. Health, C. N.Y

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 29, 1947
74 N.E.2d 190 (N.Y. 1947)

In County of Westchester v. Department of Health of City of New York (297 N.Y. 491, supra) the denial of the motion to change the place of venue from Westchester County to New York County, was by reason of section 118 of the Westchester County Charter [L. 1937, ch. 617] which expressly provided that Westchester County shall be the place of venue of any action in which Westchester County was a party.

Summary of this case from Reeve v. O'DWYER

In County of Westchester v. Department of Health of City of New York (297 N.Y. 491, supra) the denial of the motion to change the place of venue from Westchester County to New York County, was by reason of section 118 of the Westchester County Charter [L. 1937, ch. 617] which expressly provided that Westchester County shall be the place of venue of any action in which Westchester County was a party.

Summary of this case from Reeve v. O'Dwyer
Case details for

County of Westchester v. Dept. Health, C. N.Y

Case Details

Full title:COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER et al., Respondents, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH OF THE…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 29, 1947

Citations

74 N.E.2d 190 (N.Y. 1947)
74 N.E.2d 190

Citing Cases

Reeve v. O'DWYER

In any event, if an amendment of the demand be deemed necessary, it is granted under section 105 of the Civil…

Reeve v. O'Dwyer

In this view, defendants are entitled, as of right, to a change of venue to New York County. Bee Line v.…