From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Counihan v. Department of Transp. of Georgia

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 21, 1982
162 Ga. App. 374 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

63246.

DECIDED APRIL 21, 1982 REHEARING DENIED MAY 19, 1982

Action for damages. Chatham Superior Court. Before Judge Cheatham.

Joseph B. Bergen, John J. Sullivan, for appellant.

Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Marion O. Gordon, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Robert S. Stubbs II, Executive Assistant Attorney General, Roland F. Matson, Assistant Attorney General, Fred S. Clark, for appellee.


This is a wrongful death action filed by the temporary administrator of the estate of the deceased who was killed in Chatham County in a motor vehicle collision when decedent's automobile slid on ice and was struck by several other vehicles. The named defendants were the Department of Transportation of Georgia, Chatham County, i.e., Chatham County Commissioners, the Administrator of Chatham County Public Works, individually and in that capacity, the Chatham County Administrator, individually and in that capacity, and the Chief of Chatham County Police, individually and in his capacity as chief of the county police. The deceased allegedly met her death as she approached the Bull River Bridge located on a highway within the County of Chatham, State of Georgia, when she lost control of her vehicle as the result of ice which the defendants had allegedly negligently allowed to accumulate on the bridge roadway causing the collision with the bridge and other vehicles, the decedent suffering fatal injuries as the result of same.

The suit against the Department of Transportation is based upon Code Ann. §§ 95A-304 and 95A-305 (Ga. L. 1973, pp. 947, 983; 1974, pp. 1422, 1428), which has reference to suits directly against the department, as well as the liability of the department for certain suits against counties.

In addition to the answers filed denying the claims both the Department of Transportation and Chatham County Commissioners filed motions to dismiss based upon sovereign immunity. After consideration of the motions to dismiss, in two separate orders, the trial court dismissed the action based on the ground of sovereign immunity as to the Department of Transportation and as to the remaining defendants, county commissioners, county police chief, county administrator and county public works chief, on the same ground. Plaintiff appeals. Held:

1. It is elementary that one cannot sue the state without the state's consent. However, it is the contention of the plaintiff that Code Ann. §§ 95A-304 and 95A-305, supra, constitute the consent of the sovereign to allow the Department of Transportation to be sued in a wrongful death action such as here. We cannot agree based upon such cases as Tounsel v. State Hwy. Dept., 180 Ga. 112, 116 ( 178 S.E. 285); State Hwy. Dept. v. McClain, 216 Ga. 1, 6 ( 114 S.E.2d 125); Sikes v. Candler County, 247 Ga. 115 ( 274 S.E.2d 464); Mayor c. of Savannah v. Palmerio, 242 Ga. 419 ( 249 S.E.2d 224); Miree v. United States of America, 242 Ga. 126 ( 249 S.E.2d 573); Crowder v. Dept. of State Parks, 228 Ga. 436, 439, 440 ( 185 S.E.2d 908). Compare National Distributing Co. v. Dept. of Transp., 157 Ga. App. 789 ( 278 S.E.2d 648), affd. s.c. 248 Ga. 451 ( 283 S.E.2d 470) (said case involving an ex contractu action rather than ex delicto).

2. The above and foregoing cases with reference to the Department of Transportation, as a subdivision of the state, likewise applies to the County of Chatham, i.e., the Chatham County Commissioners, as representatives of the state in their official capacity. See Revels v. Tift County, 235 Ga. 333 ( 219 S.E.2d 445); Crowder v. Dept. of State Parks, 228 Ga. 436, 439 (2), supra; Roberts v. Barwick, 187 Ga. 691 (2), 695 ( 1 S.E.2d 713). Compare Duffield v. DeKalb County, 242 Ga. 432 ( 249 S.E.2d 235). We are of the opinion that the law still is that there has been no waiver of sovereign immunity by legislation or otherwise or by court decree in order that the suit in the case sub judice may be maintained.

3. The three other officials of Chatham County in their official capacity are likewise clothed with governmental immunity based on such cases as Roberts v. Barwick, 187 Ga. 691 (2), supra; Hennessy v. Webb, 245 Ga. 329, 330 ( 264 S.E.2d 878); and Holloway v. Dougherty County School System, 157 Ga. App. 251 ( 277 S.E.2d 251), wherein the application of sovereign immunity to individuals in their official capacity was also considered. Under the above authority, we see no error in the court dismissing the complaint as to them in their capacity as officials of the county. That is, as "County Police Chief, County Administrator and County Public Works Chief." We presume there has been no dismissal of the defendants sued in their individual capacity and make no ruling thereon.

Until such time as the General Assembly or the case law authorizes such a suit against the state we are bound by the above decisions and find no authority in the briefs which would authorize us to reverse the trial court.

Judgment affirmed. Banke and Birdsong, JJ., concur.

DECIDED APRIL 21, 1982 — REHEARING DENIED MAY 19, 1982 — CERT. APPLIED FOR.


Summaries of

Counihan v. Department of Transp. of Georgia

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 21, 1982
162 Ga. App. 374 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

Counihan v. Department of Transp. of Georgia

Case Details

Full title:COUNIHAN v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OF GEORGIA et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Apr 21, 1982

Citations

162 Ga. App. 374 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982)
290 S.E.2d 514

Citing Cases

Shuman v. Dyess

" Nelson v. Spalding County, 249 Ga. 334, 336 ( 290 S.E.2d 915) (1982); Dillard v. Fussell, 160 Ga. App. 382,…

Huggins v. Georgia Department of Transportation

Appellant first argues that Code Ann. § 95A-304 (a) constitutes a waiver of sovereign immunity which allows…