From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Couch v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
May 10, 1966
198 So. 2d 308 (Ala. Crim. App. 1966)

Opinion

7 Div. 740.

March 22, 1966. Rehearing Denied May 10, 1966.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Calhoun County; W.D. DeBardelaben, Judge.

Certiorari denied 280 Ala. 712, 198 So.2d 269.

Orville Couch, pro se.

Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., and John C. Tyson, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


This record reveals convictions on pleas of guilt before indictment. Constitution 1901, Amendment 37.

On coram nobis the appellant did not aver or prove that he had a valid defense or that he was innocent of the original charges.

A majority of the court considers that the judgment below must under Culombe v. Connecticut, 367 U.S. 568, 81 S.Ct. 1860, 6 L.Ed.2d 1037 ( 147 Conn. 194, 158 A.2d 239), and Lynumn v. State of Illinois, 372 U.S. 528, 83 S.Ct. 917, 9 L.Ed.2d 922 ( 21 Ill.2d 63, 171 N.E.2d 17), be

Reversed.

JOHNSON, J., dissents only because of appellant's failure to plead and prove a valid defense. Ex parte Taylor, 249 Ala. 667, 32 So.2d 659.


Summaries of

Couch v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
May 10, 1966
198 So. 2d 308 (Ala. Crim. App. 1966)
Case details for

Couch v. State

Case Details

Full title:Orville COUCH v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: May 10, 1966

Citations

198 So. 2d 308 (Ala. Crim. App. 1966)
198 So. 2d 308

Citing Cases

Rickard v. State

" Though a rule often is tested by its exceptions, here Rickard has claimed no self executing constitutional…

Hailey v. State

Hailey sought to connect his pleading guilty to chivalry in trying to shield the woman living with him from…