From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cotroneo v. Sabatino

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 15, 1977
362 N.E.2d 259 (N.Y. 1977)

Opinion

Argued January 7, 1977

Decided February 15, 1977

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, DONALD H. MEAD, J.

Robert Lahm, Sheila L. Birnbaum, Sidney Devorsetz and Irwin Birnbaum for appellant.

Donald J. Kemple for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 50 A.D.2d 1081) and because that court correctly discerned that the liability of the defendant was unrelated to that of a manufacturer or distributor of the machine which caused the injury.

Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE.


Summaries of

Cotroneo v. Sabatino

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 15, 1977
362 N.E.2d 259 (N.Y. 1977)
Case details for

Cotroneo v. Sabatino

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPHINE COTRONEO, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 15, 1977

Citations

362 N.E.2d 259 (N.Y. 1977)
362 N.E.2d 259
393 N.Y.S.2d 708

Citing Cases

Zara v. Perzan

In the case at bar, not only was the lawnmower not defective, but also, the plaintiff, although not…

Lomtevas v. City of New York

Thus, items that are perfectly harmless in their normal operation are not dangerous instrumentalities…