From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cote v. Judge of Second District Court

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. Middlesex
Oct 20, 1916
113 N.E. 777 (Mass. 1916)

Opinion

October 16, 1916.

October 20, 1916.

Present: RUGG, C.J., LORING, BRALEY, PIERCE, CARROLL, JJ.

Practice, Civil, Appeal. Mandamus.

No appeal lies from an order made by a single justice dismissing a petition for a writ of mandamus.

BY THE COURT. This petition for a writ of mandamus was dismissed by the single justice. The petitioner appealed.

Crosby, J.

A.J. Cote, pro se.


No appeal lies from a decision of a justice of this court in a proceeding at law. Alleged errors of law can be considered only on exceptions or by report. R.L.c. 173, § 96, as amended by St. 1906, c. 342, § 2, and St. 1910, c. 555, § 4. Channell v. Judge of Central District Court of Northern Essex, 213 Mass. 78.

It is not improper to add that manifestly no error of law is disclosed on this record.

Order dismissing petition affirmed.

The case was submitted on a brief by the plaintiff.


Summaries of

Cote v. Judge of Second District Court

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. Middlesex
Oct 20, 1916
113 N.E. 777 (Mass. 1916)
Case details for

Cote v. Judge of Second District Court

Case Details

Full title:ARMIDAS J. COTE vs. JUDGE OF SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF EASTERN MIDDLESEX

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. Middlesex

Date published: Oct 20, 1916

Citations

113 N.E. 777 (Mass. 1916)
113 N.E. 777

Citing Cases

St. Nicholas Russian Ben. Soc. Inc. v. Yaselko

It is plain that no appeal lies from such an order. The proper method of seeking revision by the full court…

Sheehan v. Judge of the District Court

The proper method of seeking review by the full court of a decision or ruling made by a single justice of…