From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Costilla v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jun 24, 1959
168 Tex. Crim. 335 (Tex. Crim. App. 1959)

Opinion

No. 30804.

June 24, 1959.

Appeal from the County Court, Dimmit County, Harold J. Dean, J.

No Attorney on appeal, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


The offense is driving a motor vehicle upon a public highway while intoxicated; the punishment, 3 days in jail and a fine of $100.

The record contains no statement of facts.

There is one bill of exception. It complains of a remark of the attorney for the State in argument to the jury, objected to on the ground that it was a direct reference to the failure of the defendant to testify.

In the absence of a statement of facts we are not prepared to hold that the remark to the effect that the evidence introduced 'is uncontroverted and undenied' was a direct reference to appellant's failure to testify, or that such remark necessarily referred to his failure to testify, if he did, and not to the failure to produce the testimony of eye witnesses, if there were such.

Art. 710, C.C.P. is not transgressed by argument which the jury may reasonably apply to the absence of other testimony. Byers v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 310 S.W.2d 331.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Costilla v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jun 24, 1959
168 Tex. Crim. 335 (Tex. Crim. App. 1959)
Case details for

Costilla v. State

Case Details

Full title:Marcelino E. COSTILLA, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Jun 24, 1959

Citations

168 Tex. Crim. 335 (Tex. Crim. App. 1959)
168 Tex. Crim. 335

Citing Cases

Cockerham v. State

Costilla v. State, 168 Tex.Crim. R., 327 S.W.2d 593 (Tex.Cr.App. 1959). See also 21 Tex.Jur.3d, Crim. Law, §…

Bass v. State

Clark v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 362 S.W.2d 647. See also Ramos v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 419 S.W.2d 359, 367;…