From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Corwin v. McKenzie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1920
190 App. Div. 953 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)

Opinion

January, 1920.


Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. It is competent for the jury to find as a fact that the words spoken imputed to the plaintiff, the corporation counsel of the city of Newburgh, a violation of his duty, which constituted a misdemeanor under Penal Law, section 1841. Mills, Rich, Blackmar, Kelly and Jaycox, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Corwin v. McKenzie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1920
190 App. Div. 953 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)
Case details for

Corwin v. McKenzie

Case Details

Full title:JOHN B. CORWIN, Respondent, v. CHARLES T. McKENZIE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1920

Citations

190 App. Div. 953 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)

Citing Cases

McKee v. Robert

He, as an individual, by such publication, was crippled and lessened in his ability to do the business he was…