From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Correnti v. Leclaire

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 26, 2008
52 A.D.3d 1153 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 504066.

June 26, 2008.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Anthony Correnti, Stormville, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Spain, Carpinello, Kane and Stein, JJ.


Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul an administrative determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits the misuse of state property. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, this matter is dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Medina v Napoli, 49 AD3d 1145; Matter of Applewhite v Selsky, 14 AD3d 736, 736-737).

Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

Correnti v. Leclaire

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 26, 2008
52 A.D.3d 1153 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Correnti v. Leclaire

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ANTHONY CORRENTI, Petitioner, v. LUCIEN LECLAIRE, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 26, 2008

Citations

52 A.D.3d 1153 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 5857
859 N.Y.S.2d 389

Citing Cases

Williams v. Fischer

The Attorney General has advised this Court, by a memorandum from the Department of Correctional Services,…

Molano v. Bezio

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively…