From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cornelius v. Howell

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 22, 2007
251 F. App'x 246 (4th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 07-1514.

Submitted: October 18, 2007.

Decided: October 22, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (3:06-cv-03387-MBS).

Nadine Cornelius, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Nadine Cornelius appeals the district court's order dismissing her civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cornelius v. Howell, No. 3:06-cv-03387-MBS (D.S.C. Jan. 31, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Cornelius v. Howell

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 22, 2007
251 F. App'x 246 (4th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Cornelius v. Howell

Case Details

Full title:Nadine CORNELIUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Samuel HOWELL; The City of…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 22, 2007

Citations

251 F. App'x 246 (4th Cir. 2007)

Citing Cases

Wilder-Rhodan v. State

As such, this case is subject to review pursuant to the inherent authority of this Court to ensure that…

Sweigert v. Goodman

See, e.g., Carter v. Ervin, No. 14-0865, 2014 WL 2468351 (D.S.C. June 2, 2014). appeal dism'd, 585 F. App'x…