From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coreas v. Miller

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Aug 2, 2013
536 F. App'x 708 (9th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 12-17538 D.C. No. 1:10-cv-00703-LJO-JLT

08-02-2013

GERMAN COREAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MILLER, Registered Nurse, Defendant - Appellee.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Lawrence J. O'Neill, District Judge, Presiding

Before: ALARCÓN, CLIFTON, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner German Coreas appeals pro se from the district court's summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Coreas failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether a one-day delay in changing Coreas's bandages following knee surgery caused him to contract cellulitis or to suffer further injury and undue pain. See Jett v. Penner, 439 F.3d 1091, 1096 (9th Cir. 2006) (setting forth standard for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs, and explaining that a prisoner must show harm "caused by" the indifference to establish deliberate indifference); Toguchi, 391 F.3d at 1057-58 (neither negligence nor prisoner's difference of opinion with prison medical authorities is sufficient to state a deliberate indifference claim); Hallet v. Morgan, 296 F.3d 732, 746 (9th Cir. 2002) (prisoner alleging deliberate indifference based on delay in treatment must show that delay led to further injury).

Coreas's contentions regarding the district court's alleged failure to review his medical journal evidence, and to weigh properly the testimony of an expert witness submitted by defendant, are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Coreas v. Miller

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Aug 2, 2013
536 F. App'x 708 (9th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Coreas v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:GERMAN COREAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MILLER, Registered Nurse…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 2, 2013

Citations

536 F. App'x 708 (9th Cir. 2013)

Citing Cases

Wellever v. Ryan

Estelle, 429 U.S. at 106; see also Hallet, 296 F.3d at 746 (holding that a prisoner alleging deliberate…

Lipscomb v. Rynerson

However, this medical record does not show that the fifteen to twenty minute delay in receiving care about…