From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Corcoran v. Babylon Transit, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 10, 2002
295 A.D.2d 392 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2002-01132

Argued May 16, 2002.

June 10, 2002.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Lebowitz, J.), dated January 11, 2002, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Morris, Duffy, Alonso Faley, LLP, New York, N Y (Yolanda L. Himmelberger, Matthew J. Vitucci, and Kenneth E. Pitcoff of counsel), for appellants.

Nydick Ross, P.C., Melville, N.Y. (Allan Ross of counsel), for respondent.

Before: ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P., NANCY E. SMITH, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, SANDRA L. TOWNES, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff alleges that he was injured on October 23, 1999, while riding on a bus owned by the defendant Babylon Transit, Inc., and driven by the defendant Lamont Wilson. His injury allegedly occurred on the Staten Island Expressway when the bus hit something in the road causing it to lift one to two feet off the ground. The plaintiff alleges that he was walking from the bathroom back to his seat at the time of the incident, that he was violently thrown upward into the ceiling of the bus, and that he landed hard on his spine causing a compression fracture.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendants' motion for summary judgment. The plaintiff's estimate of the speed of the bus at the time of the injury, contained in his deposition testimony and in his affidavit submitted in opposition to the motion, constituted proof sufficient to raise a question of fact as to whether the bus was traveling at an excessive rate of speed (see Shpritzman v. Strong, 248 A.D.2d 524; Larsen v. Vigliarolo Bros., 77 A.D.2d 562; Lo Faso v. Jamaica Buses, 63 A.D.2d 998). Thus, after the defendants made out a prima facie case for summary judgment, the plaintiff carried his burden of producing evidentiary proof in admissible form sufficient to defeat the motion for summary judgment (see Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320).

FLORIO, J.P., SMITH, FRIEDMANN and TOWNES, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Corcoran v. Babylon Transit, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 10, 2002
295 A.D.2d 392 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Corcoran v. Babylon Transit, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN CORCORAN, respondent, v. BABYLON TRANSIT, INC., ET AL., appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 10, 2002

Citations

295 A.D.2d 392 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
743 N.Y.S.2d 550

Citing Cases

N.Y. and Pres. Hos. v. Government Emp. Ins. Co.

However, in opposition, the Hospital raised a triable issue of fact, through the affidavit of Peter Kattis, a…

Louise v. Hampton Jitney, Inc.

(Marucci v Bird., 275 App Div 127, 129)." Guzek v B & L Wholesale Supply, Inc., 151 AD3d 1662, 1663-1664 (4…