From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cope v. Wanamaker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 15, 1936
249 App. Div. 747 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

December 15, 1936.


Action for false imprisonment brought by an employee against her employer, as a consequence of a claimed false charge of theft of four dollars. Judgment reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event, unless within ten days from the entry of the order hereon plaintiff stipulate that the part of the verdict representing punitive damages be struck out, thus reducing the verdict to $5,000; in which event the judgment as so reduced is unanimously affirmed, without costs. There is no evidence in the record to justify an assessment for punitive damages ( Walker v. Lord Taylor, 236 App. Div. 111, 114), it not appearing that the defendant corporation authorized or ratified any wanton, oppressive or malicious intent or action on the part of its employees in its dealings with the plaintiff ( Craven v. Bloomingdale, 171 N.Y. 439). Lazansky, P.J., Young, Carswell, Davis and Taylor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cope v. Wanamaker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 15, 1936
249 App. Div. 747 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Cope v. Wanamaker

Case Details

Full title:MAE M. COPE, Respondent, v. JOHN WANAMAKER OF NEW YORK, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 15, 1936

Citations

249 App. Div. 747 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Citing Cases

Teofilo v. Mego Corp.

No questions of fact on the claim for punitive damages against appellant were considered on this appeal.…

Snyder v. State

The State Trooper who was the complainant in the second information knew that the two operator's licenses…