Opinion
Argued February 13, 1935 —
Decided May 17, 1935.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 114 N.J.L. 10.
For the appellant, Lionel P. Kristeller.
For the respondent, David T. Wilentz, attorney-general.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, LLOYD, CASE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.