From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cooper v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 28, 2001
284 A.D.2d 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Decided and Entered: June 28, 2001.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Rodney Cooper, Elmira, petitioner in person.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Wayne L. Benjamin of counsel), Albany, for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Spain, Mugglin and, Lahtinen, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner challenges a determination finding him guilty of creating a disturbance, interfering with an employee, harassment and refusing a direct order. The misbehavior report relates that while being interviewed by a counselor regarding an objection of completing his quarterly review, petitioner became loud and argumentative. Despite the counselor's directive to stop yelling and remain in the room, petitioner continued to be belligerent and left.

Contrary to petitioner's assertion, we find that the Hearing Officer conducted a fair and impartial hearing. We reject petitioner's assertion that he was denied relevant documentary evidence inasmuch as he failed to request the material until after the Hearing Officer rendered his disposition (see, Matter of Infante v. Johnson, 258 A.D.2d 799). A review of the Hearing Officer's comments challenged by petitioner fail to support his allegation of bias. The record fails to establish that the outcome of the hearing flowed from the alleged bias and not from the substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Steward v. Selsky, 266 A.D.2d 605, 606).

To the extent petitioner claims that he was denied the right to present a witness who would present mitigating evidence which would lessen the penalty imposed, we note that petitioner failed to request such witness during the hearing (see, Matter of Hodge v. Goord, 280 A.D.2d 767, 720 N.Y.S.2d 409).

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Spain, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Cooper v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 28, 2001
284 A.D.2d 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Cooper v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RODNEY COOPER, Petitioner, v. GLENN GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 28, 2001

Citations

284 A.D.2d 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
726 N.Y.S.2d 598

Citing Cases

Peoples v. Fischer

The misbehavior report, positive test results and testimony of the correction officer who performed the tests…

Laliveres v. Prack

As for petitioner's claim that his employee assistant was ineffective because he failed to provide petitioner…