From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cooper v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Northern Division
Apr 3, 2009
No. 2:08-CV-18-FL (E.D.N.C. Apr. 3, 2009)

Opinion

No. 2:08-CV-18-FL.

April 3, 2009


ORDER


This matter is before the court on the Memorandum and Recommendation ("M R") of United States Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr., regarding the parties' cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings. No objections to the M R have been filed, and the time within which to make any objection has expired. This matter is ripe for ruling.

The court hereby ADOPTS the recommendation of Magistrate Judge Jones as its own, and, for the reasons stated therein, plaintiff's motion is GRANTED, defendant's motion is DENIED, and this matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the M R. The clerk of court is directed to close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cooper v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Northern Division
Apr 3, 2009
No. 2:08-CV-18-FL (E.D.N.C. Apr. 3, 2009)
Case details for

Cooper v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:RICKY COOPER, SR., Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Northern Division

Date published: Apr 3, 2009

Citations

No. 2:08-CV-18-FL (E.D.N.C. Apr. 3, 2009)

Citing Cases

Russell v. Colvin

Lastly, the plaintiff argues that the magistrate judge failed to recognize that the ALJ was in error by not…

Marshall v. Colvin

Ideally, the ALJ would provide more complete, evidence-based reasons for rejecting a third party's report.…