From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cooper Smith Prop. v. Flower's Baking

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jun 2, 1983
432 So. 2d 683 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

No. 82-1331.

June 2, 1983.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Volusia County, James T. Nelson, J.

David A. Monaco of Cobb Cole, P.A., Daytona Beach, for appellant.

John R. Godbee, Jr. of Coble, McKinnon, Rothert, Barkin, Clayton Vukelja Godbee, P.A., and Horace Smith, Jr. of Dunn, Smith Withers, P.A., Daytona Beach, for appellees.


The order of the trial court determining that the mortgagor was required to deposit with the Clerk a sum greater than the amount which the final judgment of foreclosure found to be due in order to redeem his property from that judgment, was error. A mortgagor attempting to redeem should not be required to pay any amount in excess of what the final judgment of foreclosure determines to be due. Blue Heron Land Co. v. Brown, 98 Fla. 1238, 125 So. 369 (1930). See also, Flagler Center Building Loan Corp. v. Chemical Realty Corporation, 363 So.2d 344 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). Neither do we find anything in section 45.031, Florida Statutes (1981), that requires a mortgagor to seek permission of the court in order to exercise his right of redemption, which exists up to the time the certificate of title is issued. All State Mortgage Corporation of Florida v. Strasser, 277 So.2d 843 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973), affirmed, 286 So.2d 201 (Fla. 1973); Roberts v. J.I. Kislak Mortgage Co., 257 So.2d 599 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972).

Because the mortgagor deposited with the Clerk the total amount found due by the judgment of foreclosure, prior to the issuance of the certificate of title, the redemption was proper and should not have been set aside. The order of September 14, 1982, vacating the redemption is therefore set aside, and the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to confirm the mortgagor's redemption of his property, to order the return to the purchaser at the sale of any monies paid by it, and for such further proceedings as are consistent herewith.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

COBB and FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cooper Smith Prop. v. Flower's Baking

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jun 2, 1983
432 So. 2d 683 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Cooper Smith Prop. v. Flower's Baking

Case Details

Full title:COOPER SMITH PROPERTIES, LTD., APPELLANT, v. FLOWER'S BAKING CO. OF…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jun 2, 1983

Citations

432 So. 2d 683 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

CCC Properties, Inc. v. Kane

"Before the sale" as used in the statute has been interpreted to mean at any time before the issuance of the…

Stack v. Homeside Lending

We agree that paragraph ten of the amended final judgment is not enforceable because it purports to require…