From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Conway v. Hewitt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 24, 1959
7 A.D.2d 931 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)

Opinion

February 24, 1959


In an action for money had and received, the appeal is from so much of an order as vacated a provision contained in appellant's notice of examination before trial which required respondent to produce his Federal and State income tax returns showing the cost, sale price, cost of selling and capital gains in respect to certain real property involved in the action. Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. In our opinion, the learned Special Term properly vacated the demand for the production of respondent's Federal and State income tax returns since the papers disclosed no adequate showing that the returns would reveal any fact material or necessary to the prosecution of appellant's cause of action ( Paliotto v. Hartman, 2 A.D.2d 866; O'Grady v. Burr, 2 A.D.2d 712; Kathleen Foley, Inc. v. Gulf Oil Corp., 3 A.D.2d 928). Wenzel, Acting P.J., Beldock, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Conway v. Hewitt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 24, 1959
7 A.D.2d 931 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)
Case details for

Conway v. Hewitt

Case Details

Full title:ERNEST J. CONWAY, Appellant, v. WALTER C. HEWITT, SR., Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 24, 1959

Citations

7 A.D.2d 931 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)

Citing Cases

Turnpike Restaurant v. Cohen

The plaintiff, however, has not adequately shown that the income tax and gross business tax reports will be…

Kyser v. Garrett, Inc.

The defendants claim the desired information is either not included in the business records delivered to them…