From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Conway v. Brooklyn Union Gas Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 6, 1995
212 A.D.2d 498 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

February 6, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Krausman, J.).


Ordered that the appeal by the defendant Gas Energy, Inc., is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, for failure to perfect the same in accordance with the rules of this Court (see, 22 NYCRR 670.8 [c], [e]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondents' time to comply with the order dated April 26, 1993, is extended until 15 days after service upon them of a copy of this decision and order, with notice of entry.

It was not an improvident exercise of discretion for the court to grant the plaintiffs' cross motion for an extension of time in which to complete discovery and file a note of issue and to deny the motion by the defendant Brooklyn Union Gas Company to dismiss the complaint as there was no wilful or contumacious conduct (see, Sabatello v. Frescatore, 200 A.D.2d 939, 940). Bracken, J.P., Rosenblatt, O'Brien and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Conway v. Brooklyn Union Gas Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 6, 1995
212 A.D.2d 498 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Conway v. Brooklyn Union Gas Company

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL CONWAY et al., Respondents, v. BROOKLYN UNION GAS COMPANY et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 6, 1995

Citations

212 A.D.2d 498 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
623 N.Y.S.2d 112

Citing Cases

PDG Psychological P.C. v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co.

Accordingly, Plaintiff's October 24, 2005 responses were timely. Furthermore, to the extent that any of…