From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Continental Cameras Co. v. Foa & Son Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Oct 19, 1987
831 F.2d 45 (2d Cir. 1987)

Opinion

No. 213, Docket No. 87-7466.

Argued October 13, 1987.

Decided October 19, 1987.

Peter D. Isakoff, Washington, D.C. (Richard Ben-Veniste, Ben-Veniste Shernoff, Washington, D.C., Thomas J. Fitzpatrick, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiffs-appellants.

David Franks, Uniondale, N.Y. (Frank L. Amoroso, Rivkin, Radler, Dunne Bayh, Uniondale, N.Y., on the brief), for defendant-appellee.

Appeal from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Leonard B. Sand, Judge, dismissing complaint for lack of admiralty jurisdiction.

Before KEARSE, PIERCE and PRATT, Circuit Judges.


Plaintiffs Continental Cameras Co., Inc. ("Continental"), and Metropolitan Bank Trust Co. appeal from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Leonard B. Sand, Judge, dismissing for lack of admiralty jurisdiction their complaint against Continental's insurance broker for failing to forward premiums to Continental's insurance company in time to avoid cancellation of Continental's policy and failing to inform Continental that its policy had been canceled. We affirm the judgment dismissing the complaint substantially for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Sand, published at 658 F.Supp. 287 (1987). See generally Peralta Shipping Corp. v. Smith Johnson Corp., 739 F.2d 798 (2d Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1031, 105 S.Ct. 1405, 84 L.Ed.2d 791 (1985).


Summaries of

Continental Cameras Co. v. Foa & Son Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Oct 19, 1987
831 F.2d 45 (2d Cir. 1987)
Case details for

Continental Cameras Co. v. Foa & Son Corp.

Case Details

Full title:CONTINENTAL CAMERAS CO., INC., METROPOLITAN BANK TRUST CO.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Oct 19, 1987

Citations

831 F.2d 45 (2d Cir. 1987)

Citing Cases

Exxon Corp. v. Central Gulf Lines, Inc.

"[I]t would be anomalous to hold that a general agency agreement" to, among other things, arrange for fuel…

Exxon Corp. v. Cent. Gulf Lines, Inc.

s who arrange for the supply of bunkers may sue in admiralty, see, e.g., Tramp Oil Marine Ltd. v. M/V Mermaid…