From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

CONSORTIUM CONSULTING GROUP, INC. v. CHEE TSAI

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 19, 2006
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 50663 (N.Y. App. Term 2006)

Opinion

570100/05.

Decided April 19, 2006.

Defendant Chee Tsai appeals from a judgment of the Civil Court, New York County (Jose A. Padilla, Jr., J.), entered March 5, 2004, after a nonjury trial, in favor of plaintiff and awarding him damages in the principal sum of $32,700.

Judgment (Jose A. Padilla, Jr., J.) entered March 5, 2004, affirmed, with $25 costs.

PRESENT: DAVIS, J.P., SCHOENFELD, J.


A fair interpretation of the evidence supports the trial court's determination that plaintiff real estate broker was retained by defendant-appellant and procured a ready, willing and able buyer on the terms set by defendant, entitling plaintiff to recover a commission ( see Eastern Consolidated Properties, Inc. v. Lucas, 285 AD2d 421). The evidence, fairly considered, also supports the finding that plaintiff was unaware, prior to producing a ready, willing and able buyer, of defendant's claimed need to obtain the consent of his siblings before going ahead with the sale ( cf. Norma Reynolds Realty, Inc. v. Miral, 301 AD2d 364).

This constitutes the decision and order of the court.


Summaries of

CONSORTIUM CONSULTING GROUP, INC. v. CHEE TSAI

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 19, 2006
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 50663 (N.Y. App. Term 2006)
Case details for

CONSORTIUM CONSULTING GROUP, INC. v. CHEE TSAI

Case Details

Full title:CONSORTIUM CONSULTING GROUP, INC., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CHEE TSAI…

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 19, 2006

Citations

2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 50663 (N.Y. App. Term 2006)