Opinion
Rachel Fazio, Cedar Ridge, CA, Sean Malone (Pro Hac Vice), Eugene, OR, Elisabeth Holmes (Pro Hac Vice), Blue River Law, P.C., Eugene, OR, Attorneys for Plaintiff.
STIPULATION & ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE DEADLINES BY 90 DAYS
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
This is an Administrative Procedure Act case challenging the Forest Service's approval of the Bagley Hazard Tree Abatement Project. On January 28, 2015 the Court approved the parties' proposed briefing schedule. (See ECF No. 28). The Defendants filed the Administrative Record on June 8, 2015. (See ECF No. 31). Since June 8, 2015, the parties scheduled a July 30, 2015, meeting to explore settlement opportunities.
The parties respectfully request that this Court continue all dates in this matter by approximately ninety (90) days so as to allow the parties the opportunity to focus on resolution rather than litigating. Therefore, the parties stipulate to, and propose the following briefing schedule:
Event Current Date Proposed Date Objections to Administrative Record June 22, 2015 September 28, 2015 Plaintiff's Motion June 29, 2015 October 5, 2015 Defendants' Opposition and July 31, 2015 November 4, 2015 Cross-motion Plaintiff's Combined Opposition and August 14, 2015 November 18, 2015 Reply Defendants' Reply August 31, 2015 December 2, 2015 DATED: June 24, 2015 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney By: /s/Gregory T. Broderick GREGORY T. BRODERICK Assistant United States Attorney
Good cause appearing, IT IS SO ORDERED.